ZBA Kicks Condo Parking Issue to City's Lawyer

Opponents of the proposed 41 Greenwood condos on the old Middle School site wait for three hours to speak to the ZBA and are told to come back next month.


It is hard to compare a Zoning Board of Appeals hearing to the fun and excitement of a Bruce Springsteen concert. But there is a similarity between the Boss' multiple-hour concert in London's Hyde Park last weekend and the ZBA meeting Wednesday night.

The standing-room-only audience, which gathered at 7 p.m. at the Senior Center to oppose plans for 41 condos on the site of the old Middle School, had the plug pulled before they were ready to go home.

Just as the British authorities turned off the power at the concert in the middle of the Boss and Sir Paul McCartney singing "Twist and Shout," ZBA Chairman Marc Kornitsky shut down the hearing when it was time for the opponents to speak. The hearing was already 30 minutes passed the town-imposed 10 p.m. curfew on meetings at the .

The crowd of about 40 people, many of them standing for more than three hours, left disappointed. They had come to tell the board that the plans by Groom Construction for the three-story condos do not fit in their neighborhood of all single-family homes.

They waited for two hours while the ZBA dealt with the residential construction issues on other properties. Then the ZBA, after taking a break (which the Boss never does), asked the Groom team to describe the project. But before the attorney, architect, engineer and landscape architect could talk about the project, the ZBA had to wrestle with what issues it has the authority to rule on.

That became a continuing theme for the ZBA on this project.

Town Counsel Patricia Cantor with Kopelman & Paige had ruled prior to the meeting that unlike other properties, the Planning Board, not the ZBA, had most of the town's approval authority.

Groom attorney, Bill DiMento, narrowed the issues for the ZBA to approve two issues: allowing four or five buildings proposed for the site and the location of two three-car garages on the surface. All other issues were within the jurisdiction of the Planning Board, he said.

Half of the proposed 87 parking spaces will be on the surface. The other half will be underground.

At 10 p.m., when the meeting was supposed to be over, Kornitski allowed one opponent to speak. Ken Shutzer, who represents 10 of the neighbors along Greenwood Avenue and adjacent streets, was invited to speak for 10 or 15 minutes. 

Board member Peter Spellios promised a restless crowd, "This is just the beginning."

Twenty five minutes later, Kornitski stopped Shutzer who was on a roll. He argued that the Town Meeting had approved a Planned Development District for the old Middle School site that allowed only one building of 41 multi-family units. The district, he said, does not allow for any surface parking or three-car covered garages, as proposed by Groom.

He said the reason Groom wants the ZBA to approve the surface parking is that it would be cheaper to build parking spaces on the surface, rather than having to double the number of parking spaces below ground.

Shutzer also argued that the Town Meeting did not give the ZBA the authority to change the rules governing any project built in the district.

DiMento disagreed with that interpretation.

The ZBA decided to turn the issue over to Town Counsel Cantor to decide if it had any jurisdiction over the Greenwood parking issue.

Kornitski promised that more of the opponents -- about 30 people Shutzer said -- would be allowed to speak at the next meeting on August 29. But he said, to the groans from the board and audience, that the time allowed for opposition comments at the next hearing might have to be limited since there are about eight other issues scheduled that night ahead of the Greenwood hearing.  

Whisky July 20, 2012 at 01:53 AM
Hi Red, 1) School use - I'm KIDDING - but comparing someone moving into East Boston and complaining about airplanes. 2) I will have some traffic impact - I am along the route between Greenwood and Vinnin Square. Narrow street with parking on both sides. I imagine up to 20 more trips a day may pass in front of my house. 3) I'm close enough that having a few 7 figure value properties near me would raise my value (and probably my taxes, ugh!). It just seems to me that everything about this is an improvement to the 'hood and the town overall.
Citizen Swamp July 20, 2012 at 02:06 AM
Same old list of misinformation, false dire predictions and "poor me". We keep hearing how it will affect property values in the neighborhoods where these projects are cited, but never hear how the community as a whole is impacted by interest carrying costs, building maintenance, insurance costs and the vacant building blight. We need to get these properties off the books and get needed tax receipts in the till. The threat of a lawsuit says it all about what our community is turning into. CS
Alex July 20, 2012 at 05:27 PM
List of the evil creatures hiding under the building is missing, by the reasons unknown, the dragons, vampires and zombies. BTW, it is not quite clear from your list of the underground dwellers why do they restrain themselves now from infesting your houses: after all, they have something to eat. As for the kids, as experience of, say, Summit Estates shows, the problem is not in keeping kids who live in condo out of the streets but in keeping those who do not belong out of the condo.
They won't talk about the condos until fewer people show up.
Connie August 01, 2012 at 02:15 PM
George, that makes no sense. We, as concerned abutters only show up to be informed. I, personally, am not there to fight the project. Just there to be informed. It's a public meeting, why would they not talk about it because neighbors are there?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »