patching...
Update: ZBA hearing tonite on Lowell St billboard postponed til 6/13. Total Outdoor now asking for variance in order to move sign to rear of site.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

TELL US: What's Your Top Issue in State Senate Race?

You've heard a lot from each of the candidates that will be squaring off in the primary on Sept. 6, so we want to hear from you -- what's this race all about for you?

 

The state primary is now less than a month away and the race to succeed Sen. Fred Berry is in full swing.

All four Democratic candidates vying for the 2nd Essex District seat have been pounding the campaign trail, shaking hands, holding signs and weighing in on pressing issues within the district and statewide as Sept. 6 nears.

And voters are presented with a wide breadth of experience between the four candidates, only one of which will face Republican Richard Jolitz in November.

Peabody attorney John Slattery is a former state representative and city councilor, fellow attorney Mary-Ellen Manning (who has both Peabody and Salem ties) has spent 11 years on the Governor's Council, Salem's Joan Lovely (also an attorney) is a popular eight-term city councilor and the current president of the Salem council and then there's Edward Carroll of Salem, a retired Essex County deputy sheriff who served one term on the Governor's Council in the 1990s.

Thus far, we've heard a lot of what each candidate has done or thinks on certain issues, so it's time to turn the podium over to you -- the voters of Peabody, Salem, Beverly, Danvers and Topsfield.

We want to hear from you


What's the most important consideration for you going into the polls on Sept. 6? What is this election about for you?

If you haven't decided who you're voting for yet, what do you think will most influence your choice in the coming days?

Weigh in via the comment section below, and as always, we ask that you refrain from personal attacks -- stick to the issues and the candidates.

Related Topics: Edward Carroll, Joan Lovely, John Slattery, Mary-Ellen Manning, and Race for Berry's Seat

Lisa Smith

7:42 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Is there going to be a debate before the primary? I am honestly not interested in Manning. She continues to do what she has always done on her FB and make nasty comments about people and hope that they stick. She has the same people that ran Fitzgeralds campaign. She is going to end up exactly where Sean did, losing by a large margin. I have not idea what she truly wants to accomplish for our district. I have had Slattery and Lovely come to our neighborhood but of course not Mannings...I guess that will be the same representation if she was elected...If anyone watched "You make the Call" last night you could listen to the anger in Mannings supporters and their inability to listen and accept feedback.

I guess the best way to look at all of this is that she will lose this race and will not be on the Governors Council...That is a great day!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

John Castelluccio

9:22 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Lisa, there is a debate scheduled for Aug. 14 at 7 p.m., which will be aired live by Salem Access TV. I'm not sure if it will take place in their studios or in another location.

Comment_arrow

Leo R. Jodoin

8:34 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012

For John & Lisa
I heard you wanted to know more about the debate in Salem on 8/14/12 Salem Access here it is.
Coming Tuesday August 14Th LIVE! at 7:00Pm on channel 22 Salem you can see
the Senate forum debate on !!Salem Now!! with Leo Jodoin, the candidates
will join Leo for questions and answers for the out going senators seat of
Senator Fred Berry, the candidates joining Leo are Joan Lovely-D-Salem,
Mary-Ellen Manning-D-Peabody, John Slattery-D-Peabody, Edward Carrol-D-
Salem and Richard Jolitz-R-Beverly. This will be a hour and half show we
hope this will be helpful in making your decision on who should be the
candidate representing the 2Nd Essex District. And of course if you miss the
LIVE! segment you can always watch the rerun on channel 22 or you can go to
satvonline.org and see it on the video on demand the next day. We hope you will join us
on what we think will be a very important evening.
Thank You
Executive Producer/Host
!!Salem Now!!
Leo R. Jodoin

Comment_arrow

Evan Weinberg

11:29 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012

It will be a great day when we no longer have to put up with a hateful phony surrogate from the Slattery-Joyce Spiliotis mob like Lisa Smith! I have done my due diligence here, I have never met ANY of the candidates & am not part of their racketeering crew like "Lisa Smith". John Slattery is an arrogant, loud mouth bully, who changed his vote on the death penalty years ago because the Gay lobbyists PAID HIM OFF! I spoke with 2 former state reps who served with Slattery who CONFIRMED this is true! Recently, he was happy to represent a vicious child rapist for a large amount of cash! Slattery would be happy to represent Hitler if the price is right! Joan Lovely and Slattery have something in common. THEY BOTH REFUSE TO PAY THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN BILLS TO UNION PRINT SHOPS AND THEN LIE ABOUT IT! Lovely over the last month as presdent of the salem city council rammed thru a 40 percent increase in parking fines, a $300 annual parking fee with no guranteed space, a 9 percent increase in the water rate, a 4 percent increase in the sewer bill & to top it all off-salem is the only municipality to pass an INTERNET SALES TAX! I want someone that will fight the powerbrokers, represent the average folks not special interests, & promote jobs, the economy and lower taxes. Mary-Ellen Manning has angered the all the insiders, left wing extremists and crooks, inside the state house and the corrupt democratic party, which means she is doing something right. Mary-Ellen Manning gets my vote!

Comment_arrow

Janet Marino-Johnson

12:03 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I just received a HIGHLY UNETHICAL MAILING FROM Joan Lovelys campaign. She sent absentee ballots out, stating, "its going to be a low turnout so I need your vote with an absentee ballot" OUTRAGEOUS! There are only 3 reasons for absentee ballot usage-NONE ARE FOR POLITICAL REASONS JOANIE! 1) Illness, 2)out of town, or 3)religious. Joan Lovely should be ASHAMED OF HERSELF! You owe the people an apology using such an dirty, unethical trick! DONT VOTE FOR JOAN LOVELY--VOTE EDWARD CARROLL STATE SENATE!

Stephen Raymond

8:00 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Ethics and the economy. I want to see someone sponsor a bill for mandatory sentencing for corrupt politicians. I also want to see pay and benefits cut and eliminated respectively for our part time legislature.

Reply

Saber Walsh

8:19 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

My biggest issue is with the candidates: all are "more of the same," and it's this kind of "sameness" that has gotten us into this mess. I think it's time to start looking for non-attorneys to step up and start fixing what has become our Statehouse: Disneyland for law practices.

Besides that, as much as our pols like to say how safe our area is, it is anything close to that. The "sugary drinks" ban our government has foisted on us is all about its inability or unwillingness to get tough on crime: our kids can't ride their bikes in the street because of the plethora of people either unlicensed or should not have their license on the streets, and gangs and/or drug dealing taking over the play grounds.

On the subject of getting tough on crime, it's time that they took action against drugs. The same morons who brought us the "sugary drinks" drivel have also dubbed drug-related crimes as "non-violent." Really? Anybody read the news lately? Oh yeah, we are supposed to believe that Mexican violence is an artifact of the NRA's policies, not the fact that Americans can't seem to get enough of their drugs, and there's nobody in society except the police willing to try to stop that.

And about the police. They are trying to do their jobs, and yet we have a court and parole system that is a total joke. Reform of the parole system was window dressing. We need more than Melissa's Bill -- we need truth in sentencing.

So I'm disappointed in the candidates, but let's hope.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Raymond

9:32 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

@Saber, your point about attorneys is an excellent one. 99% of attorneys are terrible with their own money and even worse when it comes to the public's. For the record, I work in financial services so I'm speaking from experience.

Carl

8:26 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

I want all the free loading to stop. I am sick of paying for people who get rewarded for not working, or not getting a job because they want to wait until all their benefits have been exhausted. I was at BJ's and the guy in front had sushi and steaks in his cart, paid with an EBT card and when I met him outside, I asked him how he could live with himself. He said, "I'm milking the system", and "how do you like my new Audi"? Just an example.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jaclyn Corriveau

12:57 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

@Carl, Manning is the only candidate who has spoken out against Governor Patrick's outrageous veto of the recent attempt at EBT reform. She, like you and I are sick of freeloading. Check out her press release on EBT abuse here: http://peabody.patch.com/announcements/manning-highly-critical-of-governors-outrageous-veto-of-ebt-reform-bill

Julia Gentile

9:24 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

I want fiscal sanity and austerity, NO new taxes, a tough stance on violent crime, support for business growth, a turnaround in the growth of government dependency, (EBT Madness and expansion), and INTEGRITY. I will vote for Manning.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jaclyn Corriveau

12:58 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Manning will be the first one to tell you that there is not a revenue problem, the state has a spending problem.

Todd Perry

9:35 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

We are going in the wrong direction by rewarding non-productivity. We are rewarding laziness under the guise of people being "less fortunate". Soon, we will have more people collecting than contributing. I want to see a work component built into the welfare state.....almost everyone can do something. No one begrudges those who are physically unable to work. Everyone else, get off your fat behinds and stop making working people support you. I am an independent voter, leaning Manning. (Slattery is definitely out).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jaclyn Corriveau

12:59 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Have you gotten a chance to check out her website? www.maryellenforsenate.com
I think you will find that she is only on who has spoken out on these issues, like EBT reform, and has a history of acting on them.

Kori Hansen

10:59 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

I support green energy and am opposed to people making bad choices. Sugary drinks and meat contribute to our obesity epidemic and should be restricted, (maybe by a tax, if not an outright ban). I do not want to see poor people humiliated by having their benefits reduced, and as long as working people can buy cigarettes they should too. I am not happy about the economy..I cannot find a job and I have a college degree in psych. I think greedy business people should be taxed more. If you make 125 k or more, you should give at least 60% back to the rest of us who built the infrastructure you leach off of. I will vote for someone who will help fix this system and restore the economy. Joan Lovely got rid of the filthy power plant and she has supported Salem business with growth in the Wiccan and psychic genres.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathleen

9:12 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Kori, are you kidding me? Please explain to me how anyone who is WORKING and making $125 K or more is 'leaching' off of anyone? And why should that WORKING person give 'at least 60%' of their hard-earning income back to anyone? (especially those that are NOT WORKING. Your logic is completely warped. This 'logic' makes you part of the problem not the solution! You should be thankful that there are so many 'greedy' business people out there working to support people like you.

Diane Bonagura

11:18 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

One issue that deeply disturbs me is the explosion of child sexual abuse and child pornography that has been magnified by the internet. I want to see tougher sentencing for these monsters. I do not believe they can be cured or rehabbed. This rules out Slattery. of course, given his record. I will look at the other candidates before making a decision, but this is my main issue.

Reply

Paula

12:17 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

An issue that I am appalled at is the cost of higher education. Especially in a lack-luster teetering economy - this is a cost that just goes up and up. There is no longer much of a choice for this generation - in order to get a a decent job - most employers are requiring a college degree. If the choice for our kids is a college education or a non-living wage do they really have a choice at all about whether to go to college in order to become self-sustaining independent adults or skip college and become a "subsidized" generation. If we can't come up with a way to make college education affordable (and by affordable I don't mean offer loans which will put people into debt for decades) then it is time to bring back appentice programs and learn on the job pathways in lieu of a college education.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Raymond

1:23 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Paula makes a great point!!! Outside of the USA there are only a handful of countries that charge their students for a college education, and even there, like in the UK, its a small nominal fee that covers upkeep of the buildings and a bit towards the teachers' pension. Our system penalizes students and cripples them with high debt just when they're starting out! The prohibitive cost jeopardizes our competitive edge in a global economy.

Diane Bonagura

2:12 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

We are at the point where, unless you are pursuing engineering or science, a college education is no longer worth the money. You are better off financially with a two year degree in medical techhnology, i.e. radiology, PT asst, etc....or the trades. You start off 150k in the hole with no career path if you major in Liberal arts!

Reply

Jaclyn Corriveau

1:05 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

I would like to point out that Manning is only one who addressed any of the issues mentioned above. She has a history of looking out for you, the tax payer on the Governor's Council. She is the one that you can depend on.
www.maryellenforsenate.com

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Raymond

11:12 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

OK Jaclyn we get it, you LIKE manning. But the articles asks "what's your top issue"

Mike Schulze

9:33 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

John Slattery's maiden speech was for a raise for Health care workers.the lowest paid state workers.He represented Peabody well in his terms at the statehouse.His constituent services were excellent , He always got back to you and he worked well with the other legislators from the North Shore. As an Atty.he realizes that you can not even have a trial unless the accused is represented even if everyone KNOWS the accused is guilty. Manning should be disbarred for her comments in the Salem News and her opinions on the law.The people on these patch blogs that are representing her are really amazing. The more they spout for their candidates ,the more votes they lose. Joan Lovely is also a good person and works well with others. I am voting for Slattery and you Tea Party people with the cute pictures can vote for whoever in Kansas you are able to vote for. Same goes for the Governors Council. Best of luck! Oh, I am not a Union member or on welfare or in a gay marriage.I do support all of the above though and I vote!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pat Green

10:12 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

@ Mike Schulze. Seriously? Disbarment for questioning a candidates sincerity? Also, I doubt anyone commenting on a democrat race on the Peabody Patch is a "Tea Party" person from Kansas. You, sir, sound like you might have gotten into the whiskey tonight...or vodka...whatever is your pleasure. Don't drive tonight. Please.

Karen McCourt

10:17 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

John Slattery is an proven impediment to the current forces in the state, and to the general US, that empowers very large banks, lenders and corporate entities from generating such unbridled laissez faire policies that they once again tank the economy and put a large portion of the US population out of work. Now that it has happened under a Republican dominated 2000's, and while we all sit quagmired in a limping economy, the iron is hot to prosecute those banks who invented the dishonest mathematics that hollowed out a stable middle class. This same economic destruction by unimpeded banks has created a population that is driven by a fear and anxiety of the moment. Even in our district there is a population that wants to strip those suffering economic hardship of help, make it harder to convince large lenders to re-negotiate home mortgages, keep those of non-European decent out of our country, and inject austerity and God into our politics. No thanks. The history books are too full of lessons to vote for anyone other than Slattery. I am concerned about keeping my hometown and home state a model of real everlasting democracy. I am concerned about the inevitable de-stablization of a nation that continues a lewd discrepancy of wealth across its
population. It's bad bad news.

Wake up. Labor, gays, Dominicans, liberals and newspapers did not package up rotten mortgages into securities and sell them to the public with triple-A ratings.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Schulze

10:42 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

So I take it that you are going to vote for Elizabeth Warren,John Tierney,and Barack Obama like me. Good for you! Now let's work on those newspapers and Dominicans?Are they Monks?

Jeanne Billings

10:44 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Jaclyn C. really needs to identify herself as someone that is working on Ann Manning's campaign. She pulled this with Fitzgerald's as well. I am all for public opinion but lets have full disclosure if you are going to continuously comment on everyone's comments...I am looking forward to the debate instead of the phony press releases that seem to be the MO for the people that are running Ann's campaign and also ran Sean's...Same people with the same tactics...Hmm we wonder how that will work out...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Schulze

11:04 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Jeanne, Relax , it is not Anne and Sean lost.He never pulled any of this stuff.He ran and he and Ted are OK! I think we should stick to the issues of the 2nd Essex campaign. The same people are doing the same stuff to Eileen Duff. They are turning people against their candidates.Manning and Bulmiller were asked to disavow these people or agree with them.Their silence speaks volumes!

Mike Schulze

10:55 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Sam Adams,a great American Beer,maybe a Guinness,or Smithwicks. Not driving tonight,I am at a church vigil praying for the Tea Party. I am out looking for a picture to put up next to my name. Maybe I will use Janet Wu's picture! Maybe Ed Harding?Pat let's have a beer! You buy!

Reply

Leave a comment