Exactly four years ago this month, the bottom dropped out of the U.S. economy.
Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy on Sept. 15, 2008. The next day, the Federal Reserve announced a bailout of AIG. Bad news continued to pile up almost daily, with the stock market collapsing and millions of jobs vanishing.
No single factor will define such a complex process as selection of a president, but none might be greater than the simple question: Are you better off than four years ago?
In Massachusetts, the state unemployment rate in August was 6.3 percent, up from 6.2 percent in July. Unemployment in the Commonwealth peaked at 8.7 percent in August of 2009. Nationwide, unemployment was at 8.1 percent in August 2012.
Sales of single family homes in Massachusetts in August 2012 saw a 20 percent increase from August 2011, according to the Warren Group.
“One more month of strong home sales confirm speculation that the housing market recovery is underway,” Warren Group chief executive Timothy M. Warren Jr. said in a statement.
Are you better off than you were four years ago? Or is your financial life the same or worse? Can you credit a presidential administration with business' success or failure or is the state of business left to business leaders? Let us know in the comments section.
CoachRaf2
11:30 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Don't forget that the federal debt per person is now around $51,000. (For a family of four, that's $204,000 added to your mortgage). Four years ago, it was around $34,000. (You had an added $136,000 mortgage four years ago).
So before you answer the question if you are better off now that four years ago, take something you have that's worth $17,000 - maybe like a relatively late model car - and destroy it. For each family member, destroy another $17,000 object you own. If you don't have anything worth $17,000, destroy your neighbors property but make sure he doesn't count it as one of the things he needs to destroy, (If you don't want to think about destroy these things, pretend that you're sending them to China).
And if you believe that the town of North Andover has a $118 million in unfunded liabilities, thats about $4,000 each of us owes ($16,000 for a family of four). I'm not sure what this figure was four years ago.
Gail
2:39 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
the republicans caused the debt.
salemst
2:46 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
"Republicans caused the debt"
Democrats controlled the House from 2007-2011, Democrats have controlled the Senate from 2007-Present, and Democrats have controlled the presidency since 2009.
I guess your "Ostrich Defense" is better than no defense at all
Gail
6:03 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
The war caused the debt and that was republican
MIT
7:19 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
If the Republicans caused the debt, then why do democrats continue to spend?
john
7:23 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Bush is responsible for about 4T in debt over 8 years. Obama is repsonsible for 5+T in less than 4 years. Nice try gail. Oh and if the wars are causing the debt why hasn't obama ended them.
Mikbee
9:02 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
If your so worried about the increasing debt then I assume you understand why your taxes have to go up to pay for your full share of government operations. If we leave an army in Iraq and Afghanistan for ten years is it a mystery to you that you are responsible for a part of that expense? That your share of the debt has increased? Who do you think pays for this stuff? Maybe you'd rather have the elderly pay your share by cutting off medicare and social security payments?
john
9:15 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
We don't have a taxation problem. We have a spending problem. Gail brought up the debt topic. That is the liberal hypocrisy. Debt was such a concern under Bush but now that obama has completely blown that out of the water it seems to no longer be an issue. I didn't like the debt under Bush and I don't like it now. We need massive spending cuts not massive tax increases.
Gail
9:53 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
We have a taxation problem. We don't take in enough tax money to pay our bills. We can make spending cuts but the programs we need have to be apaid for and that will require more tax money.
Mikbee
9:58 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
We do have a taxation problem in that we are a trillion short of the amount we need to pay the bills every year. We need more income and we need to cut spending. You can't cut a trillion in spending in one year and still have a country left standing. The current budget is the old pre-Obama budget which was never fixed because Congress won't do the right thing and allow the Bush tax cuts to expire and put military spending on the table as part of the spending reductions.
john
11:58 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Haha. That's classic. You are defending obama by his dereliction of duty of not passing a budget in 4 years. Oh and by the way his budgets were voted down 99-0 in the senate. He couldn't even get the dems to vote for it.
The last budget obama was working from was a 450B dollar deficit. He increased spending in his first year by a trillion dollars and has continued that level of spending ever since. So if he can raise it a trillion in one year we can cut it. The Bush tax cuts were tax cuts for all and they increased revenue to the government. The only reason we aren't taking in enough money is because the economy isn't growing fast enough and we are spending to much.
hammergjh
11:41 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
The country didn't bottom out right when Obama took office. That was later. The damaging affects of W's economy were still in place. Since then Obama's policies have led us to where we are today, booming stock market, job growth, low inflation, etc. Not back fully yet but we are on the right track.
Stevie Nicks
6:11 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
WOW. YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT?
john
7:24 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Of course he believes that.
hammergjh
10:31 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I believe it because it's the undisputed truth. What Faux News BS do you believe.
salemst
11:50 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
No chance. This is one abysmal economy with few middle and upper middle class jobs being created.
Massachusetts unemployment numbers are deceiving. 6.3% Unemployment, but not included is a 15% underemployment rate. Lots of bartender and waitress jobs, not many 50-250K jobs being created.
Gail
6:10 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Bartenders and waitresses make good money a lot of the time. Also the food services industry jobs have gone down in MA while science and tech jobs have gone up so you are wrong anyway.
Candy Sweets
10:19 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Hey I have waitressed before and I made a LOT of money doing it! Don't bash waitresses!
salemst
11:54 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
One other note. The Stock market hasn't had anything to do with the US since the early 2000's when Wall Street and Main Street divorced.
Obama's economy is like dropping into a 1000 foot hole under Bush, then for four years bumping along at the bottom of it
It's mostly based on the International business economy/Emerging Markets. We're passe.
pamela boucher
12:04 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
i think we are getting better since Obama as president and when he is back in for another four years we will be better off. he was poor himself so he knows what is like. the rich doesn't what poor and middle class is about ok. from, pam
Candy Sweets
10:18 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I agree!
salemst
12:25 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Obama knows what it's like to be poor, then become rich working for the government.
Is this the experience we need from him to get our economy moving, if re-elected?
Using his getting rich as a government employee experience to help the country?
Bob Samson
1:22 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
I have always wondered how Obama became a millionaire. It has been government jobs or non profits.
Bill
2:07 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Got got rich with his books that he "wrote". The only 40 year old with two autobiographies. The newest bio on him failed to corroborate many of the facts in his own books.
Gail
2:42 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Mitt Romney got rich by having a rich family and only wants to help the people who already have a lot of money.
Anja Poulsen
8:57 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Obama was never poor. Even when he lived in Indonesia he went to an exclusive school. In Hawaii, he lived with his grandparents and went to private schools. I know Michelle said his poor grandmother faced hardship in climbing the ladder at her job, but his grandmother was Vice-President of a bank! The whole growing-up-poor thing is a fabrication.
Mitt Romney's father was a refugee from a revolution. George Romney went to work at the age of 12. When he grew up, he started his own business. He went on to become Governor of Michigan. Mitt Romney didn't become rich off his father's money, either. Mitt gave away his entire inheritance.
There is so much disinformation out there, it's ridiculous.
Bill
2:04 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Poverty rate at 30 year high, record number of people on food stamps, below 2% GDP growth, record deficits, 4 yrs above 8% unemployment..real unemployment rate is 15%. Labor force participation is also at a 30 yr low, under 58%. And, many of the people leaving the labor force are being shoved onto SSI. Healthcare costs still climbing above inflation. Yup..a great four years. Worst recovery ever.
I know, Bush's fault....got it. Every President inherits a mess in some way, but only Obama has made a career out of making excuses. Imaging if GWB spent eight years blaming Clinton for not killing Bin Ladin when he had a chance. Recall, he took a pass when he was consumed with his impeachment trial for lying about cheating on his wife in the oval office with an intern.
Candy Sweets
10:18 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
It's getting better every day cheer up!
Linda Dieter
2:21 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
The truth is, whoever becomes president has got to bite the bullet and make a lot of cuts to programs we all cherish and would like to hold onto, but, balancing a budget doesn't work that way. When you go to vote in November, which candidate is willing to use his experience in balancing budgets to get us back on track in the future, and which one would rather spend us into debt that will eventually sink us all. Any jobs that have been created are mediocre, and don't pay enough to pay the bills. We need both quality and quantity--not jobs that don't even pay for the groceries.
Gail
2:49 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
They need to cut spending on the military and raise taxes for wealthy people and Mitt Romney has said he will not do either of those things.
david m
11:51 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Amen. One of the candidates had an opportunity to create jobs and didn't in the four years in office. He wasn't the leader of all Americans as he promised, but rather he catered to the Hollywood performers and got the media to idolize him, covering up his errors in judgement. On the other hand, we have someone who has the credentials to get the country moving. I bet he doesn't say, when he is President, that he inherited a mess. He will roll up his sleeves, actually meet with those who advise him on the economy as well as his military advisors. I say vote for Romney.
Gail
2:40 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
We are much better off today than we were 4 years ago. Economy is better and the housing market is a lot better.
salemst
2:44 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
You must be living in a parallel universe.
You see the Bloomberg Financial News headlines today?
Business Activity in U.S. Shrinks for First Time Since 2009
By Michelle Jamrisko - Sep 28, 2012 11:28 AM ET .Facebook Share LinkedIn Google +1 COMMENTS
Business activity in the U.S. unexpectedly contracted in September for the first time in three years, adding to signs manufacturing will contribute less to the economic recovery.
Gail
2:48 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
It says unexpectedly which means it's unusual which means business activity has grown since 2009. So that proves we are better off than we were 4 years ago.
Bill
3:56 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Tell that to the people in my neighborhood selling at 50-100K less than they bought
Stevie Nicks
6:12 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
You are kidding right? You really do not believe that do you? - Oh my!
john
7:27 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gail, you are seriously delusional.
John Buba
3:54 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Romney:
Hard worker, good family man, God fearing, gives a ton to charity, smart business man, turns around failing companies, saved the Olympics after an unbelievable scandal and once shut down his whole company and moved to NY to help a colleague find his missing daughter (they found her).
Oh and he once strapped a dog in a cage to his station wagon.
Obama:
Don't know much about his upbringing and college years because he won't tell us, never had a real job, got ahead in life by his brains and affirmative action, was head of the Harvard law review without ever publishing an article, a mediocre senator with no major legislative achievement, consorts with knows anarchists and goes to a church that professes to "God-damn America".
Oh and he once ate a dog
MIT
7:24 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
obama is a moron, if it wasnt for a teleprompter, he would not know what to say.
Gail
7:46 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Mitt Romney even said he doesn't care about 47 percent of the country's people. How's that for anti-American?
david m
12:11 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Gail,
He didn't say he didn't care for the 47% but said that they would vote for Obama because he gives them things for free (well you and I pay for them but don't let that fact get in your way). Have you heard the woman who calls her phone the Obamaphone. She actually thinks he pays for it and gives it to her. I hope you wake up from your four year slumber and vote for the person who will get this country back on track to success not over a cliff.
chester suchecki
4:35 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
ask obama for his birth certificate not his certificate of birth . two different pieces of paper and where was he born? kenya perhaps?
Gail
6:04 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Here come the racists again.
MIT
7:28 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Any person who voted for obama garbage is anti-american themselves.
Gail
7:43 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
MIT a lot of people voted for Obama who love America. Just because they don't vote for your guy doesn't make them anti-American.
Candy Sweets
10:17 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Obama was born in Hawaii!
cash
2:22 am on Monday, October 1, 2012
ya a kenya village, and thier missing one idiot!!!!
gene
5:01 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Let's see 4 years ago we were losing 750,000 private sector jobs a month and today were are gaining about 150,000 private sector jobs per month, the stock market was around 6500 today its over 13000, corporate profits for 2 quarters of the last fiscal year set new records, Osama bin Laden is dead and GM is alive, and we are getting out of the 2 wars that the last Republican president got us into. Yes I would say we are better off!!!
Gail
6:04 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Well said!
john
7:29 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Wow, did those talking points come straight from the DNC website or do you have a direct line to DWS.
Stevie Nicks
6:15 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Gail go get a job and pay some taxes will you please. You need to take your head out of. It may bring you around to reality. I can not belive you and your comments. Where have you been the last three pus years. Certianly not in this country. OMG!
Gail
7:45 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Stevie I have a job and it pays well and I do pay taxes and don't mind paying taxes to help keep the country going and to pay for services people need. The economy has been getting better for a couple years now whether you acknowledge that or not.
MIT
7:14 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
LIBERALS ARE DESTROYING OUR NATION. OBAMA HAS NO QUALIFICATIONS TO BE PRESIDENT. WHEN THE COUNTRY VOTED FOR THIS NITWIT INSTEAD OF A USA WAR HERO LIKE JOHN MCAIN, THATS WHEN THE COUNTRY HEADED IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.
THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPALS. VOTE ROMNEY.
Gail
7:46 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
John McCain would have been a disaster as a president! He lost the election when he picked Sarah Palin to be his running mate!
gene
8:17 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Maybe the next time if you add the bold font to the capitals and it will make your rant more believable. However, John McCain would have been a disaster as a president. Being a war hero does not make one a good president. The country made the right choise 4 years ago and they should do the same this year. GOD BLESS THE USA AND GOD BLESS PRESIDENT OBAMA!!!
john
7:30 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Please list obama's qualifications to be president. He is the most unqualified person to ever be president and it shows.
Mikbee
9:47 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Nothing conservative about a country founded on the proposition that all men are created equal. That was an insanely progressive idea for it's time. Now that everyone demands to be treated equally conservatives are up in arms. Romney objects to the 47% expecting equal treatment and demonizes them as being less than real Americans. How about we don't vote for Romney and have a democracy where everyone's voice matters regardless of economic status.
Candy Sweets
10:16 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
You need to calm down and unclick the caps button.
Buzz
8:24 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Yes, we are better off than 4 years ago. My wife and I started a new business in early 2010 which has been successful. Are things perfect? No, but I'll take Obama over any of the Republicans any day. We will also vote for Elizabeth Warren over Brown.
Gail
9:16 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Yes! And congratulations on your business.
john
7:30 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Yes congrats on your business. Just remember you didn't build it.
Candy Sweets
10:16 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Glad to hear!
SAM DELOACH
7:22 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
You are lying
SAM DELOACH
7:23 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Sorry submitted too early Meant to say Sorry you are lying . The government built your small business... Congrats anyway
Bob Samson
9:28 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
$120,792,954,000,000 is the total amount of the United States unfunded liabilities. It is going up fast as I write this comment.
Who is going to pay this when it comes due?
Jeffrey Lefman
7:43 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gail will...
Mikbee
9:14 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I wouldn't worry about it, the answer is the funding won't be available and payments won't be made.
Gail
9:43 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
If we raise taxes like we should have a few years ago, it would be paid for already.
Shazzan Nights
9:33 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Gail and Buzz will pay it when it is due.
Gail
9:55 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
You will too. Stop being so stingy.
JL
9:50 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Holy crap...there are morons still on the birther BS?? Unbelievable. Most of the general public is too stupid to even insult.
Gail
9:54 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
They are so racist they will believe any crazy ideas to avoid the idea of a black man being president.
JL
10:03 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Hahahahaha...John Buba, that was great. Completely full of nonsense and stuff you either made up or regurgitated from Fox News, but my favorite part was "god fearing", as if that's a positive trait. The man is a deeply entrenched member of one of the country's most dangerous cults. And his "gives a ton to charity" is called "tithing". His cult requires it. He's a savvy investor, nothing more. He has no spine, no values, nothing that anyone can stand behind. He's dangerous because he's such a wild card. So easily manipulated.
Gail
9:42 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Mitt only does things that make him richer or make his church richer. Not for the good of others.
jason wert
11:25 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Wow you guys really are all nuts haha. John mcain? Omg, seriously, running our country? I am not particularly fond of obamas run so far but I did vote for him, he was
Gail
9:42 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
John McCain was a joke and when he picked Sarah Palin it was all done.
Candy Sweets
10:14 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
John McCain is way too old and confused to be president. He would lose the keys to the white house and accidentally bomb people. He is past his prime!
Jay Burnham
5:59 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Wikipedia Definition: TROLL: In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
A lot of TROLLS seem to be out and about on this comment section. So far, only two commenters have answered one of the three simple questions that were asked.
My answers: 1)Yes - 2) It's actually better - 3) At this point in time: The administration.
john
7:35 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Yes I am better off. But I am always better off because I take repsonsibility for myself. I will always be better off no matter who is in office. I don't vote for what a candidate promises to give me or help me with. I vote for the person he will be best for the country as a whole and that person is not obama.
helen burns
8:33 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Well said. I believe your statement reflects the attitude of the majority of people in this country. Hopefully the last sentence will be true also.
Tricia
12:34 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Helen, you're in for a rude awakening cause Obama is a a shoe-in. Romney needs to stay in the private sector where he belongs. He has no interst in serving the public. He just wants to amass more wealth for himself and the super-rich so he can go ahead and install his car elevator in La Jolla. Republicans are only interested in repackaging feudalism and as far as they are concerned the middle class are the peasants!!! SO VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRATS!!! If you're not in the 1% voting for any republican would NOT be in your self interest.
Jeff Twohig
7:57 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
The only way you could be better off than 4 years ago is if you own either a gun store or a liquor store. This President is an unmitigated disaster. Putting him in the Oval Office was comparable to taking the guy out of the mailroom and, with no training, making him CEO. Beyond his incompetence though is a far darker reality and that is that this President has utter disdain for America, Americans, the Constitution, in short, everything this country has ever stood for. November cannot come too soon so we can rid the country of this cancer.
Gail
9:40 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Dramatic much Jeff? I am better off than 4 years ago and I don't own a gun or liquor store.
salemst
9:44 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Jeff, far worse off here as well. Horrendous in the corporate private sector economy. They make money but don't spend it as Obama gives them no incentive, instead gives them a disincentive to do so with all the looming increases in cost of doing business.
So they sit on their money or spend it overseas thanks to Obama's anti jobs policies.
Joey Johnson
6:20 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Bet I'll bet you have an EBT Card, don't you Gail?
Both you and Candy need to go down to WAPUM WARREN's $2M Teepee in Cambridge and have some more of the kook-aid you've been drinking.
SAM DELOACH
7:28 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
This just in.. We tracked down Gail.. We believe it is really Professor Warren. Doing the bidding of her puppet masters in DC. Like she will do if elected !!
David
8:50 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Wow, pretty troubling to read such vitriol and personal attacks from members of my community.
I'd bet that if the media and our leaders were to re-frame the debate, that there would be alot more places where we all agree than where we disagree.
I think we all want many of the same things (e.g. politicians should represent constituents over special interests, a strong economy, fairness in tax policy, clean air and water, strong schools, no wars). But while we're all busy attacking each other, we're not working to fix the real problems.
It would be nice to have those discussions instead of these.
salemst
9:35 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
We're an ungovernable nation deeply divided between 'American Dream' and 'Government Dream' proponents.
If you're American Dream hoping to make a better life for you and your family where your kids supersede your lifestyle within the private sector, you're likely a Republican and Romney supporter as I am.
If you're Government Dream hoping to make or not make a better life for you and your family where your kids may or may not supersede your lifestyle working within the government sector or desire to be permanently subsidized by government you're likely a Democrat voting for Obama.
We're about 50-50. 50% of people pay Federal Taxes. If you're pulling or desire to pull the wagon, you're fighting against another sitting in or forcing you back into the wagon demanding to be pulled.
Gail
9:41 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
That's because people on the right hate President Obama so much. I've never seen so much vicious hatred directed at any public official before. These people need to see a shrink.
Candy Sweets
10:13 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
People are crazy today!
Tricia
12:45 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Well said David. I agree. Salemst, you are so misguided. Go back and reread your own comments. Democrats set forth policies to achieve the American Dream. Republicans set forth policies to hoard global wealth in the Grand Caymans. You sound terrified that someone might need assistance. Well, I don't think there is too much more there that can be gutted considering what happened with the last two rounds of the Bush tax cuts for the rich. It ended up with teachers/firemen/policemen losing their jobs. Arts and music programs getting slashed. Nowadays, some towns charge a fee for their kids to attend kindergarden and ride the school bus not to mention athletic fees are sky high. Salemst, get a grip. Everyone else, VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRATS!!!
Mikbee
1:12 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I'm a working man and I don't care if I work for a private company or have a government job. A job is a job what difference does it make to me. If I have a government job I'm spending my paycheck in the private sector. Many private sector companies live off of government contracts. Heck the whole defense industry lives off government contracts. The government is the biggest employer in the country and all those employees spend their pay in the private sector. The only division in this country lies with those who don't want to pay for public services and foreign wars since they somehow don't understand that they are the government and they have to participate in the cost.
Shazzan Nights
9:11 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
BABY HUEY/MR.MAGOO 2012
Bob Samson
10:11 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Invoice to: GAIL
Your Share of National Debt
Amount: $51,094
Assessments:
Democrat $5,000
Total amount due $56,094
Gail
10:42 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I will gladly pay that because I'm not a stingy person like most people on the right are. I'll pay that in addition to the money I give to community charities.
Bob Samson
12:05 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
OOPS s/b $112,188 as 50% pay no Income Taxes in US
Tricia
12:50 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
The tax breaks for the super rich cost this country $1.2 trillion per year (could be more now). That is basically welfare for the rich. And Scott Brown has made if fully clear that he supports this kind of welfare for the super rich. What a disgrace!!! Ted Kennedy must be rolling over in his grave. I miss Ted:(
Bob Samson
1:47 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
@Tricia I doubt you have a link to prove that claim, but go ahead and prove it.
Tricia
2:28 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Bob, I got that figure from an indepth RollingStone Magazine article, The Party of the Rich, How the Republicans Abandoned the Poor and the Middle Class to Pursue their Rlelentless Agenda of Tax Cuts for the Wealthiiest One Percent, by Tim Dickinson, dated Nov 24, 2011.
Candy Sweets
10:12 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
My life is a lot better now! I got a really good job last year and I love it! People stop hating on Obama so much!
Carl Reppucci
11:06 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gail,
What percentage of income is that for you? Do you eat meals to pay your share of taxes for the town you live in? $1500 is only $15 for your town, eat up, that's what North Andover is calling us for, so they can waste money putting our kids in a weight room that they "DON'T NEED" and school superintendent in a rented room for more than four years at a cost of $100K per year. The Town leaves a building empty for years and can't figure out what to do.
Town assessor, 60 homes built, they don't know that mine, like the others has a basement and wanted to raise my taxes 10%.
Oh, meals tax plus an increase in tax rate.
My job, chemist, down 30% income - gas up 100% from $2 to $4
Imagine, if a student drives to school and needs $60 per week in gas, and makes only $8 per hour how does that compare with 1985, 1990, 1995 etc. - it is bad all they way around.
Gail
11:23 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Carl I pay taxes, federal and state. And local property tax as well. And yes I eat in my town so I pay the meals tax and I'm glad to do it to help support services needed. Not all of us complain about taxes when we know it helps support services.
Carl Reppucci
11:41 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
It doesn't help that they are spending needlessly. Why pay the meals tax? Donate your money, that's right, instead of $15 pay them the $1500 and don't eat out!
The schools need you. Donate your $1500 to families paying an increase in bus fees -
Pay Gail, keep paying more and you will get less services. You are not supporting needed services your paying for mistakes and misspending. Cut the taxes, no meals tax, no trash taxes, give us back the $1.7 million in an override that they are not spending properly.
Gail what do you think the town needs: Telephone budget of $100K, police building and school building not functional for years - keep paying, glad your on board with paying!!
Gail
11:54 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Carl if you don't want to support your community why don't you just move?
Bob Samson
11:48 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Invoice to: Gail
Dated: 9/29/12
Your Share of Massachusetts Debt
Amount: $15,687
Assessments:
Democrat $2,313
Total amount due $18,000
Gail
11:53 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
You're not going to get me to say we shouldn't pay our debt.
Carl Reppucci
11:50 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I eat in other towns because needs are spread throughout the nation.
I eat out because I want to eat out. I don't like paying a tax that I can't control how it is spent.
Property tax is bad enough - again, if property values go up your taxes are up and despite proposition 2.5, a section of town can pay way more in property tax. Check yours then check mine tell me if I should pay more.
What is a good number Gail - what percentage of income should you pay in taxes?
All taxes: Property, income, social security, local meals, fees?
$100K salary, if health insurance for a family of 4 is $550/ month your down to $93000; gas at $130/week down to $86000; have a mortgage? Do you buy food?
Life insurance?
Oh cut that salary in half and some of the numbers stay the same - is that better?
Bus fee up 10%? Taxes Gail
What percentage total: Property tax on $300000 is $4600 or nearly 5% on salary of 100k or 10% tax on $50K
What number looks good to you? To support what again?
Gail
11:52 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Spending on schools, health care, Medicare and Social security are important to me, among other things. Spending money to educate our children and keep them safe is not needless spending!
Mikbee
1:20 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
You get social security back when you retire. But the question goes back to you. What don't you want to pay for? What public services are you willing to do without?
Carl Reppucci
11:55 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
School committee and town manager care? For more than 4 years after override and still spending needlessly $100K per year in rent and telephones at $100k per year
What else is wrong?
Is your property tax bill correct - check against your neighbors.
Tricia
12:54 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Town budgets have been hit hard because of the failed Republican policies at the federal level. That is why it is so important to vote for Warren and let Scott Brown stay home and fold laundry for his wife and kids.
doc holliday
12:21 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gail -How about the bags of s*it on welfare.I suppose you support them too.
gene
12:35 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
So now EVERYONE who's on welfareis a bag of "s*it" You need to get out of your little minded world and see that there are people who because mental or physical illness can't work or that there are people who have lost their jobs and homes and need this help to transition to another job.
You pick on the poor because they easy prey. You are nothing more than a bully and a disgrace!
Gail
4:39 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
What was that about Republicans being more generous?
doc holliday
12:45 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gene-not all but most.
Cindy Parent
2:13 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
The embarrassment of a Vice President, Joe Biden, contributed a fraction of a percent of his income to charity. Mitt contributed $4,000,000. So now you're going to tell me that democrats care more about people? I don't think so! Joe likes to spend everyone else's money, not his own.
Cindt
Gail
4:35 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Mitt wants policies that will hurt the poor and the middle class. A charity donation doesn't make up for that.
Carl Reppucci
2:15 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
If the town can rent space then the town budget isn't hit hard enough.
Cut the taxes.
During the trash tax moment a neighbor of mine graduated NA high school and went to Dartmouth - so much for how bad things were - some kids are smart some are average - no amount of money will fix that.
Leave my community - the meals tax is every where now but the town of north andover called me? 29000 population spending $1500 on meals (prepared food) generates $435000. Guess they can keep renting space for the "need" and raise bus fees because people (average person) doesn't need their 1% spent on food or the money spent for the bus. Is that right?
Romney will allow for investors to support companies that I work for - research to product, like pharmaceuticals, material science, green chemistry - it takes people with little money, big ideas and people with more money to create jobs.
Not taxes for renting buildings for superintendents to spend inefficiently and town budgets to be blown on empty buildings for years.
You know in a small company I have seen presidents of the company sitting at used desks, poor office spaces, working with the people they employ. No cell phones or latest Windows products. We work with Windows 2003 does the Town do that?
Gail
4:36 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Wow your business sounds fun to work for.
Carl Reppucci
2:18 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gail,
Your community is not the town in which you live - you should not be against other towns - that is a political ploy developed by democrats - Meals tax was Deval Patrick
Pitting one town against another instead of opting for a 7% meals tax statewide.
To increase traffic here in North Andover - take away meals tax, take away CPA tax - be different not the same and sell it!
Gail
4:37 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
CPA tax allows us to do projects that we need to do.
David Pelletier
3:28 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Dumbocrats really are.
Cindy Parent
5:26 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gail, As a republican I do believe in helping folks who are struggling and sincerely need a little help. However,I do resent my tax dollars going to people who have no intention of working. We've created a permanent underclass with generation after generation of families who've never worked. (If you want to increase something, just subsidize it). Democrats are in effect buying their votes.
Joey Johnson
6:23 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Right on Sister!
Gail's on her way down tot he local packie store to use up her EBT card benefits before midnight Sunday night.....
Carl Reppucci
5:37 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
They used the CPA tax for a church - that is not right and for costly gutters at Stevens Estate.
Town Tax is all they need. CPA protected the watershed, which is now complete. End the program, the state cut back on its matching.
CPA needs to be cut also because the town makes more money on new growth.
Let Stevens Estate go, it is a money pit not a money maker.
CPA for things we need - yeah then use it, fix brad street school and put superintendent in it. Fix old police station cheaply and use that or better yet:
Eliminate weight room at high school and that part of physical education and use that space.
Get spec Ed in town no transport out. Send message to state and fed by not supporting tax increases to stop mandates that cannot be funded.
Stop town pensions of all kinds, I don't get one, why should they.
Keep town trash pickup, restore bussing service immediately.
Assessor doesn't have his act together eliminate that and privatize it.
What projects for CPA? Name all programs at the school and lets eliminate the ones that we don't "need". You list them - I'll take the ones out and will see if we agree.
Lets make the discussion real.
Paul J
7:35 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
The answer is "NO". Savings interest rates are down, taxes are up, people who are selling houses are losong, etc, etc.
The liberals want me to be more concerned with what Mitt does with his money than Obama does with mine. One of the reason why MA has a lower unemployment rate is due to the increase in people employed as civil servants, municipal employees, or government agencies. Also, Baystate Politicians are in bed with Obama to just name a few. Liberals, crawl back into you holes from which you came and take Obama with you.
jason wert
10:27 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Yes definately better off despite many financial hurdles. Everything is going up & my income is going down but I am a fighter & always find a way. Sometimes u have to push a little harder in tough times to achieve the same results. All this energy spent complaining & blaming eachother could be put into making life better for youself. Life is tough but ultimately we are responsible for where we are in life, not the president. I'm sure 4 years from now ill feel the same
Carl Reppucci
4:39 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
I agree Jason, but at the same time we don't people taking our hard earned money away needlessly. Imagine in North Andover we voted down a trash tax and guess what, the town was fine without it. Now people forget the $1.7 million in an override that we are paying but you know if the town gave it back - the town would be fine and probably better off.
Energy must be spent to force the spenders for justification of the spend not just its ok to ask for a meals tax and spend $100K for rent needlessly.
Mickey Long
10:46 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Yes! Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
Visit www,NahantDems.com/jobs-jobs-jobs
Gatsby
10:05 am on Sunday, October 21, 2012
refverf
Jim Smith
9:00 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
I don't know, this girl believes so,
http://youtu.be/6JB7fhN5-RI
John M
6:35 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012
Wow sad to read all these posts. 47 percent of Americans are on some type of Federal program for handouts. We are headed to a 3rd world country. OB just keeps spending and spending and this will get us in trouble. It is to bad the main stream media can herd all the folks like cattle.
Anne Sweeney
6:39 pm on Saturday, March 30, 2013
No